Camera Rocket Review Our evaluation of NX200 vs V1

Image Quality

RAW image quality independent of lens

NX200
8.4
DxOMark Low light, DxOMark Color depth and DxOMark Dynamic range

Focusing

How fast and easily does the camera nail focus

NX200
6.6
Focus lag and focus points

Responsiveness

How much delay is there between you and your photo?

NX200
8.0
Focus lag, continuous shooting and Startup delay

Reviews

What do the experts think?

NX200
9.1
Reviews from mirrorlessrumors.com, techradar.com, trustedreviews.com and 4 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Benchmarks Real world tests of NX200 vs Nikon 1 V1

Low light image quality Highest ISO setting that still achieves great image quality

NX200
618 ISO
Nikon 1 V1
346 ISO

Resolution Results from photos of standard resolution charts

NX200
2,900 LPH
Nikon 1 V1
2,600 LPH

Focus lag Delay between fully pressing shutter to image capture

NX200
365 ms
Nikon 1 V1
97 ms

Shutter lag Delay to take a photo when prefocused

NX200
84 ms
Nikon 1 V1
73 ms

Startup delay Delay from power on to first photo

NX200
3,600 ms
Nikon 1 V1
1,300 ms

Continuous shooting Delay between fully pressing shutter to image capture

NX200
7 fps
Nikon 1 V1
60 fps

Features Key features of the NX200  vs Nikon 1 V1 

Megapixels Maximum resolution images are captured at

NX200
20 MP
Nikon 1 V1
10 MP

Max ISO Maximum light sensitivity of the sensor

NX200
12,800 ISO
Nikon 1 V1
6,400 ISO

Focus points How many different points the camera can focus on

NX200
15

Screen size Larger screens make it easier to preview and review photos

Pixel size How much area of the sensor is dedicated to each pixel

NX200
18.3 microns
Nikon 1 V1
11.6 microns

Reviews Word on the street

NX200  vs Nikon 1 V1 

7.7
6.9
The Samsung NX series does not offer an in-body stabilization system but the 18-55mm kit lens, the 50-200mm tele lens and the excellent 60mm Macro all offer an efficient image stabilization system.
NX200

9.0
8.0
hd video, review, hd, 3 inch LCD, 1080p, compact, csc, dslr, micro four thirds, 20 megapixel, samsung, APS-C, compact system, 7fps, AMOLED, i-Function, i-Fn, nx 200, nx-200, nx200, Samsung NX200.
NX200

8.0
6.0
The Samsung NX200's APS-C sensor eclipses other rival's Micro Four Thirds offerings in terms of both size and resolution, so we'd expect to see better image quality and low light performance from this camera over that of its peers.
NX200

Overall

8.2 Out of 10
7.5 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs

sensor

NX200  vs
Nikon 1 V1 
Type CMOS CMOS
Megapixels 20 MP 10 MP
Resolution 5472 x 3648 3872 x 2592
Size APS-C Nikon CX
Area 23.4 x 15.6 mm 13.2 x 8.8 mm
Crop factor 1.5x 2.7x
Pixel size 18.3 microns 11.6 microns
Light sensitivity 100 ISO to 12,800 ISO 100 ISO to 3,200 ISO
Codecs
RAW
JPEG
Self cleaning sensor Yes Yes
Tested vertical resolution 2,900 LPH 2,600 LPH
Tested horizontal resolution 2,900 LPH 2,600 LPH

focus system

Type Contrast detection Hybrid detection
Focus points 15 135
Supports continuous No No

shutter

Min 30 s 30 s
Max 1/4000 s 1/16000 s

form factor

Size 117 x 63 x 36 mm 113 x 76 x 43.5 mm
Thickness 36 mm 43.5 mm
Weight 200 g 294 g
Is weather sealed No No

features

Includes a GPS No No
Supports HDR No No
Automatic panorama Yes No
Create realistic 3D images Yes No
Image stabilization

video

NX200  vs
Nikon 1 V1 
Video 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps
Shoots video in 24p No No
Shoots high speed video No Yes
External mic jack None 3.5mm
Autofocus while shooting video Contrast detection Phase detection
Autofocus type Contrast detection Phase detection

display

Type OLED LCD
Size 3" 3"
Resolution 614 k dots 921 k dots
Has a touch screen No No
Has a flip out screen No No
Supports live view Yes Yes

viewfinder

Viewfinder mirror None None
Viewfinder No Yes
Type N/A Electronic
Coverage N/A 100%

performance

Max continuous shooting 7 fps 60 fps
Battery life 330 350
Continuous shooting
60 fps, JPEG
7 fps, JPEG
Focus lag 365 ms 97 ms
Shutter lag 84 ms 73 ms
Startup delay 3,600 ms 1,300 ms
Samsung NX200
Report a correction
Nikon 1 V1
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus